Dead End vs. No Outlet – The Roads to Nowhere

Q: Why are some roads marked “Dead End” and some marked “No Outlet?” Is there a difference?

A: One theory is that wealthy neighborhoods petitioned to eliminate “Dead End” signs from their streets because it reflected poorly on the status of their residents. But that’s completely untrue. There’s a manual that traffic engineers use when determining appropriate sign usage. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) specifies that the “Dead End” sign may be used at the entrance of a single road that terminates or ends in a cul-de-sac, while the “No Outlet” sign may be used at the entrance to a road network from which there is no other exit. The sign choice comes down to whether it’s just one road or more than one road with no other way out.

Fender Offenders

Q: How far can tires legally extend outside the body of a pickup?

A: Sometimes I wonder if when I answer a question I’m unwittingly assisting someone in winning an argument. So I have my own question in response to this one: Are you asking because you want to make sure your pickup complies with the law, or because you made a bet? I’m okay with either option; I’m just curious. Continue reading “Fender Offenders”

Impaired Driving: Alcohol vs. Drugs

Recently I was asked if the legalization of marijuana was having an impact on impaired driving. I knew anecdotally, from conversations I’ve had with the law enforcement community, that officers were encountering more drivers impaired by marijuana, and I knew that over the last few years we’ve had a trend of less alcohol impaired drivers and more drug impaired drivers, but I hadn’t taken a close look at the data. Continue reading “Impaired Driving: Alcohol vs. Drugs”

Turn Signals and Turn Lanes

Q: If I’m in a lane that is designated for right or left turns only, do I really need to use my turn signal?

A: The answer according to Washington’s law is, “Yes.” That answer finds it’s support in RCW 46.61.305, which states, “No person shall turn a vehicle or move right or left upon a roadway unless and until such movement can be made with reasonable safety nor without giving an appropriate signal . . .” Unlike many of the other RCWs we’ve addressed in Road Rules, this one doesn’t have any exceptions. Even in a designated turn lane, a turn signal is required. Continue reading “Turn Signals and Turn Lanes”

Crash Safety – A Visual History Lesson

Over the past decades we’ve seen huge reductions in fatalities from traffic crashes. Lots of factors account for the improvement: better laws, shifts in driver attitude and behavior on impaired driving, improved road design and major technological leaps in vehicle engineering. Take a look at what happens when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety crashes a 1959 Chevy BelAir with a 2009 Chevy Malibu.

Once you get past the fun of watching all the broken car pieces fly around in slow motion, take a look at how the crash impacts the space where the driver sits. I love vintage cars, but that ’59 BelAir didn’t do so well. IIHS has some more pictures on their website, as does this site.

Bumper Cars and Parking Karma

Q: A driver who was paralleled parked backed up to get more space in front in order to leave, but in the process, bumped into the car behind. The driver got out, looked at the two cars’ bumpers, and drove off. As a pedestrian, I observed this happen and noticed that there didn’t seem to be any damage to the other car’s bumper. Did the driver handle this situation correctly?

A: I suspect that the scenario you described happens with moderate frequency. I know I’ve witnessed similar events, where a driver checks for damage from a parking lot bump, and seeing none, leaves. I’m willing to bet that most people think, “No damage, no foul.” But even though that’s how drivers often handle the situation, it doesn’t make it right according to the law. Continue reading “Bumper Cars and Parking Karma”

Crosswalks – Part 2

Previously we answered the original question about when motorists are supposed to stop at crosswalks, but I want to go a few steps further and look at pedestrian duties, crosswalk enforcement and survival skills. Let’s begin with rules for pedestrians crossing the street; first in crosswalks and then at other locations. At crosswalks pedestrians really only have one rule: Don’t run out in front of a car, making it impossible for the driver to stop in time. Again, seems obvious. However, have you ever seen a pedestrian step into a crosswalk, right in front of a car, because sending a text message was higher priority than checking for traffic? Cars are required to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians in crosswalks, but that doesn’t relieve the pedestrian of the requirement to pay attention and have reasonable expectations about how much distance it takes a car to stop. Continue reading “Crosswalks – Part 2”

Blinding Brake Lights

Q: I was following a newer Escalade a few nights ago. At a stop sign, when the driver applied the brakes, I was blinded by the stop lights. This sounds like a minor complaint, but it was dark and I couldn’t see for several seconds. The RCW does not address the brightness of rear lighting. What gives?

A: On the face of it, you’re right. If you search the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) you won’t find any statute that specifies a maximum brightness for brake lights. However, I can make a trail from state to federal law that will answer your question. While you will find general vehicle equipment requirements in state law, the federal government regulates the details in the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS). These details are what vehicle manufacturers have to comply with in order to sell a vehicle in the United States. FMVSS 108 covers vehicle lighting. If you have a degree in industrial engineering and an abundance of time you may find it an enjoyable read. For the rest of us, it’s enough to know that one of the charts in the code specifies a minimum and maximum intensity for stop lamps. Continue reading “Blinding Brake Lights”